Lots to think about
On it goes: Some friends have been called up to the reserves, while others are hosting entire families and other animals, fleeing from the missile-scarred, literally shell-shocked north. And the TV images from Lebanon continue to numb us all.
Many people around me are very vocal in their support of this war, while a significant amount have not been vocal in any direction. Then there are the others who are vocal in their opposition (mostly behind closed doors.) And finally, there are those who say wholly unhelpful things. "Smash the Patriarchy!" for example. While I am, in theory, as anti-patriarchy as the next feminist, I am at a loss as to where and when anyone would begin smashing it at this sensitive stage.
Nevertheless, having spent every waking/non-working hour glued to the Israeli TV coverage, I couldn't help but notice how very male the news seems to have gotten over the past week. And I'm not the only one- I was pleased to see that Orna Coussin from Haaretz noticed too, and delves into the phenomenon in far greater detail.
Gender politics aside: this scratches the surface of something very troubling. Since I moved here going on 7 years ago, I've regularly been brought back to the point of questioning if there is a problem in voluntarily chosing to re-locate within a society where there remains such an obvious socio-political emphasis on the culture of militarism. And where those who do not or cannot ultimately subscribe to the social dominance of the said culture of miltarism risk being isolated, ridiculed or silenced, even labelled as non-patriots or traitors. Is this a characteristic for a healthy society to aspire towards, to such a great degree? This question has arisen more times thank I would have liked until now- and this new war is providing a new, undeniably unsettling, perspective.
- Hoping everyone stays safe.
Many people around me are very vocal in their support of this war, while a significant amount have not been vocal in any direction. Then there are the others who are vocal in their opposition (mostly behind closed doors.) And finally, there are those who say wholly unhelpful things. "Smash the Patriarchy!" for example. While I am, in theory, as anti-patriarchy as the next feminist, I am at a loss as to where and when anyone would begin smashing it at this sensitive stage.
Nevertheless, having spent every waking/non-working hour glued to the Israeli TV coverage, I couldn't help but notice how very male the news seems to have gotten over the past week. And I'm not the only one- I was pleased to see that Orna Coussin from Haaretz noticed too, and delves into the phenomenon in far greater detail.
Gender politics aside: this scratches the surface of something very troubling. Since I moved here going on 7 years ago, I've regularly been brought back to the point of questioning if there is a problem in voluntarily chosing to re-locate within a society where there remains such an obvious socio-political emphasis on the culture of militarism. And where those who do not or cannot ultimately subscribe to the social dominance of the said culture of miltarism risk being isolated, ridiculed or silenced, even labelled as non-patriots or traitors. Is this a characteristic for a healthy society to aspire towards, to such a great degree? This question has arisen more times thank I would have liked until now- and this new war is providing a new, undeniably unsettling, perspective.
- Hoping everyone stays safe.
21 Comments:
At 10:44 PM,
Gilly said…
I think that we need to blow them up to show who's really packing and who's just stuffing socks...
At 9:31 AM,
Anonymous said…
Did you see Channel 10 this morning? They had a professor bloke talking about this exact subject- he was very angery and said that the media was playing into Israel's inherent sexism. Maybe they were reading your blog last night!
At 12:01 PM,
kasamba said…
You know, I'm so politcally challenged, I feel like the guy in mailroom judging what the directors on the top floor are doing....
All I know is that I am praying for the safety of everyone there and hope that in some way, peace will prevail.
At 12:22 PM,
CathyW said…
Very good point. This militarist approach is marginalising women into the stay indoors and we'll protect you mode...or the gung ho we can tough it out with the men tripe. You have written that soo well..and it is all becoming so male orientated and I have been thinking that myself. Where are the female voices besides their tears of terror and pain? Fantastic post.
At 7:49 AM,
Anonymous said…
I am somewhat at a loss as to why you would be surprised that, in a week of war unfolding before your eyes, war and those who fight it would dominate the news...
Is it, then, that you find the war coverage offensive because it puts too many men out there on your tv screen. And the sight of men is bad, apparently?
Israel is one of those very rare nations were the military is absolutely necessary for immediate survival. There is a very simple solution, as you may realize, to your current distressful situation.
At 9:05 PM,
tafka PP said…
Gilly- ha ha.
DH- good to know, thanks.
Kasamba- this has nothing to do with Political Correctness, don't worry! Keep praying.
Beerli- thank you!
Anonymous- you *completely* misunderstand my point, although in some ways you have proven it by misinterpreting me. It isn't as simple as "It's the army, fighting a war, stupid!" I am as aware as the next Israeli as to what extent we rely upon military protection. And how militaristic the culture is, and to what extent that effects gender relations in Israeli society (not just this week) And I'm entitled to complain about it, or wish it were different, without having to abdicate my Israeli citizenship and up and leave in the process. I'm sorry if that wasn't clear to you.
At 10:36 PM,
Anonymous said…
anon 7.49 am, I find your comment to pp patronizing. let me inform that the Israeli news 24 hours is right now more than simple sounbites from Zahal, it is commentary, opinion, etc which is where the male/female ratio has been clear, ie with no women, even specifically when they have been discussing things not connected to military like psychological or medical discussions. There was a professor on the news commenting on this also. I don't know what your real motive is in attacking her like that in a patronizing way, that you would question her account which is in fact true.
At 10:32 AM,
Arelcao Akleos said…
So it is "patronizing" to state that I am at a loss as to why you would find it surprising that those who fight wars dominating the news in a week of war? It is a "misunderstanding" that led to my writing that you find the war coverage offensive because it puts too many men out there on the tv screen?
Well, now I am not at a loss. And now understand better your use of the word "understand".
Thank you for your answers to my questions, and I hope you revel in your right to be perturbed by the presence of men. Assuming, unlike Beerli, you are not also affronted by the presence of those tripanaceous women who appear before you while being guilty of toughing it out with the men.
At 10:33 AM,
Arelcao Akleos said…
Yes, I decided that such warm regard deserved my not hiding in the wideflung ranks of the Anonymous
At 10:37 AM,
westbankmama said…
tafka - I have noticed this "too many male voices - too much testosterone" theme also - and I find it extremely exasperating. It is obviously coming from people who are safe to go about their lives - while those "too macho" guys are risking their lives keeping the bombs from reaching them. Where is the gratitude? Where is the cool-headed realization that we are dealing with terrorists who want to kill everyone in Israel - and that the only thing keeping from them being successful is those "testosterone laden" men? I, for one, thank G-d that I live in a country where the men don't hide behind the women and the children - they are out in front and are fighting.
At 11:10 AM,
tafka PP said…
AA- hello and thank you for revealing yourself- who on earth said anything about being "perturbed in the presence of men?!"
My post and subsequent comments were not critical of the military itself: They were noting that in times of war, (and in general) Israeli culture defers to a male, militaristic model of news coverage and information provision. This doesn't "perturb" me in the slightest, especially in view of the reporting being about the activities of the (mostly male) army. Yet as a feminist in an aspiring society, it disturbs me that women's voices are not being heard to the same level, being as we comprise over half of the population. Are we clear?
WBM- if you see my above comment to AA, you may notice that my post and the "too much testosterone" thesis (which I already know how you feel about, having been following your blog) are not actually linked. There are plenty of women with what to commentate on various aspects within this conflict, yet all the "experts" being pulled out of the sock drawers on all channels appear to be overwhelmingly male. Which says something about our society which I personally find disturbing.
The rest of the points you bring up are not actually related to what I wrote in this post or anywhere else: But I would like to clarify for the sake of any other confused readers that by commenting on distaste for militaristic culture I was not suggesting even for a second that I am not grateful for the protection we are all being afforded by the thousands of soldiers (including many friends and family members) currently out there.
At 5:38 PM,
ggggg said…
May we know peace- or at least relative calm- in our land very soon!
At 4:14 PM,
Jameel @ The Muqata said…
Tafka PP: How come we don't hear anything from the usually outspoken Sheli Yechimovitch?
Could it be that as one of the big promoters of the "Arba Imahot" (Run out of Lebanon) campaign, that she's afraid of getting shouted down?
Could it be she doesn't want to go head to head with Amir Peretz?
Or perhaps, she really agrees with the war???
It's interesting that we havent heard her...I'm just curious as to why. (Her silence is deafening)
At 8:54 PM,
Anonymous said…
I am getting really tired of this. This blog is entirely written by a woman. If you want to become an objective source for chocolate-laden parrot-infested commentary on the Middle East, I suggested you become a man at least some of the time.
G
At 8:59 AM,
Anonymous said…
Jameel,
You're kind of proving PP's point: even a serious, opinionated woman like Sheli Yachimovitch, (whether you agree with her or not), are pushed into the background while the 'big men' talk about the 'real important stuff' on TV. We will dedicate a couple of minutes of news time per hour for the ladies, but only when they are crying hysterically over the katushyas (which we real men know are not such a serious weapon, at least not compared to some of the toys we have!) and worrying about their sons sent up north.
PP, I pretty much agree with everything you have said, but perhaps one small sign of progress might be found in the fact that we have civilian PM and Defence Minister. For sure they aren’t women, but nor are they coming from that same-old, one-dimensional militarist background as many of their predecessors.
We are now at a critical stage of this conflict, as it moves from the military to the diplomatic realm, I hope that the political leadership will provide political leadership now, after all that is what they are supposed to do, rather than being an alternative/additional arm of the military.
It'll be interesting to see how Tzippi Livni gets involved in the next couple of weeks…
Yellow Boy
At 5:22 PM,
tafka PP said…
Lakewood Venter- Amen!
Jameel- I refer you to what "Yellow Boy"- nb BOY- said: Thank you for proving my point!
G- I know, it is shameful. Please forgive me.
YB- You are right. And as you have correctly noticed, my complaint isn't related to Livni, or Miri Regev, or even Condi: It is the deeper messages.
At 6:20 PM,
Anonymous said…
PP,
I mentioned Tzipi Livni because Miri Regev sounds like a man and Condi looks like a ladyboy.
YB
At 6:29 PM,
Anonymous said…
Ah, the Yellow Boy has to sully his feminism with humor- even he is a victim of the Patriachy!!!
At 7:34 PM,
Anonymous said…
Ha ha ha!
Guilty! (but you know its true!)
Yellow Boy
PS How many feminists does it take to change a light bulb?
At 10:33 AM,
Liza said…
Great post, pp, and the points you raise are quite accurate. The coverage we are seeing is symptomatic of the macho, militaristic attitudes that we see here on a daily basis, even with no connection to the current conflict.
As far as the commenters here, I'm constantly amazed by the information that some people manage to extrapolate from blog posts, the hidden meanings that we ourselves didn't even realize we were hiding!
At 2:34 AM,
Karma said…
Oy, it makes me nervous that some of your friends have been called up to the reserves because we have a lot of mutual friends, and last I checked in (which was before anyone was called up) no one was called up, and I was hoping to remain in this denial state forever.
Um and hello idiot anonymous, that we only see men fighting the war is also a part of the problem. Try to deconstruct the layers of messages within what you're seeing.
Post a Comment
<< Home